The opposing field is the nurture enthusiast, another large group of scholars who believe that the source of a human personality is nurture, rather than inheritance. According to those scientists, a person is born with a blank slate of mind, and the various sources influence the development of a human personality, shaping its form throughout a person’s life. The most major sources of influence are prenatal and parental impact, although peer influence, the increasing role of medial, socio-economic conditions and marketing efforts are also known to be largely responsible for the shaping of a human personality.
A help with the goal to explain to your readers in very easy to understand, layman's terms, is avaliable at GoodTherapy . This website explains the nature vs nurture as something that impacts the way that we look at mental health, and patient culpability. You can use this to provide a simple explanation, or to write an essay arguing that patients need advocates and understanding, and not judgment. This resource also touches on the controversial John Money situation in which a child born male was raised as female after a horrific accident shortly after his birth. In spite of being raised as a girl, the young man grew up to identify as male, and suffered horrifically before his tragic death. This is a great case to research if you are arguing that nurture only plays a limited role.
One of the most debated example of nature verses nurture is the criminal element, why to criminals commit their crimes, is it because of their DNA and genetics, or is it because of their upbringing? Criminal behavior has always been a focus for psychologists due to the age old debate between nature and nurture. Is it the responsibility of an individual's genetic makeup that makes them a criminal or is it the environment in which they are raised that determines their outcome? Research has been conducted regarding this debate which has resulted in a conclusion that both genes and environment do play a role in the criminality of an individual. This evidence has been generated from a number of twin, family, and adoption studies as well as laboratory experiments. Furthermore, the research has stated that it is more often an interaction between genes and the environment that predicts criminal behavior. Having a genetic predisposition for criminal behavior does not determine the actions of an individual, but if they are exposed to the right environment, then their chances are greater for engaging in criminal or anti-social behavior. Therefore, this paper will examine the different functions